↓ Skip to main content

Los anfibios en la medicina popular española, la farmacopea de Plinio y el Dioscórides

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Los anfibios en la medicina popular española, la farmacopea de Plinio y el Dioscórides
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, March 2015
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702015005000010
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Ramón Vallejo, José Antonio González

Abstract

This article presents a list of medical remedies based on the use of amphibians in Spanish popular medicine and in the classical world. It provides an overview of bibliography relative to folklore studies, ethnographic work and research on social or medical anthropology. It documents a total of 113 remedies and the use of nine species of amphibians, two from the family of caudates (urodeles) and seven anurans. Most of these remedies are based on the popular "preconception" about the influence of amphibians and healing by transmitting an illness to a living creature. The traditional use of certain threatened species is emphasized, an issue to bear in mind in decision-making in the field of conservation biology and environmental education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Ecuador 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 32%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,113,315
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#155
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,481
of 278,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.