↓ Skip to main content

Pesquisa e desenvolvimento responsável? Traduzindo ausências a partir da nanotecnologia em Portugal

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pesquisa e desenvolvimento responsável? Traduzindo ausências a partir da nanotecnologia em Portugal
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702017000100005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo F.C. Fonseca, Tiago Santos Pereira

Abstract

This article analyzes how responsible innovation has been discussed and implemented in the context of one of the Portuguese government's main activities to foster nanotechnology. Through the actor-network theory and the sociology of absences, we investigate the process of coproduction at the International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory to identify how concerns about responsible development have been implemented or ignored in the rules and practices. The institute emerged from a sociotechnical imagination that views it as an autonomous unit for producing technological innovations aimed exclusively at increasing competitiveness in a global market, which has been an obstacle to the materialization of robust responsible development practices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 36%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,325,512
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#307
of 1,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,293
of 424,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#15
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.