↓ Skip to main content

La epidemia de cólera como condensador de sentidos: culturas urbanas, narraciones clínicas y políticas higiénicas en Rosario, Argentina, 1886-1887

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
La epidemia de cólera como condensador de sentidos: culturas urbanas, narraciones clínicas y políticas higiénicas en Rosario, Argentina, 1886-1887
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, April 2017
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702017000200002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecilia M. Pascual

Abstract

This article investigates how the 1886-1887 cholera epidemic in Rosario, Argentina led to discrimination among city spaces associated with foci, the production of certain socio-moral images about the sectors most affected, and the development of emergency clinical practices. Based on analysis of the signifiers used to define areas of segregation, I seek to show how working-class living conditions were one of the most pressing problems of urban expansion, to identify tensions between the application of hygiene measures and the evacuation or eviction of working-class sectors and to examine the role of displacement in the definition of suburban spaces.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Linguistics 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,210,865
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#285
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,678
of 324,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.