You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness-ntu computation with a mathematical model for cross-flow heat exchangers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0104-66322007000400005 |
| Authors |
H. A. Navarro, L. C. Cabezas-Gómez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 88 | 53% |
| Energy | 9 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 52 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
#14
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,584
of 174,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them