↓ Skip to main content

Efeito do ciclo de queima sobre as propriedades tecnológicas de uma massa cerâmica vermelha para revestimento poroso

Overview of attention for article published in Cerâmica, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efeito do ciclo de queima sobre as propriedades tecnológicas de uma massa cerâmica vermelha para revestimento poroso
Published in
Cerâmica, November 2005
DOI 10.1590/s0366-69132005000300009
Authors

M. F. Pinto, S. J. G. Sousa, J. N. F. Holanda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 44%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 33%
Materials Science 2 22%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cerâmica
#6
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,709
of 160,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cerâmica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them