↓ Skip to main content

A influência do tipo de cimento no desempenho de concretos avançados formulados a partir do método de dosagem computacional

Overview of attention for article published in Cerâmica, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A influência do tipo de cimento no desempenho de concretos avançados formulados a partir do método de dosagem computacional
Published in
Cerâmica, May 2011
DOI 10.1590/s0366-69132011000100002
Authors

A. L. de Castro, J. B. L. Liborio, V. C. Pandolfelli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 30%
Student > Master 6 22%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 48%
Chemistry 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2013.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cerâmica
#53
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,269
of 121,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cerâmica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them