↓ Skip to main content

Vigilância para acidentes e violência: instrumento para estratégias de prevenção e controle

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vigilância para acidentes e violência: instrumento para estratégias de prevenção e controle
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, July 2007
DOI 10.1590/s1413-81231999000100006
Authors

Eliseu Alves Waldman, Maria Helena de Mello Jorge

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,722,739
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#728
of 2,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,762
of 78,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#20
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.