↓ Skip to main content

Deficiência, autismo e neurodiversidade

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deficiência, autismo e neurodiversidade
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1413-81232009000100012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco Ortega

Abstract

This article analyzes the emergence of the neurodiversity movement in the context of studies about disabilities and the political organization of disabled people. The neurodiversity movement is organized by the so-called high functioning autists, who believe that autism is not a disease to be treated and, if possible, cured. It is instead a human difference that has to be respected just like other differences (sexual, racial, among others). The activists of the neurodiversity movement oppose the groups of parents of autistic children and professionals seeking for a cure for autism. This article presents the arguments of the pro- and anti-cure groups and analyzes both positions as well as their impact upon the field of health and the development of public policies for autists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 4%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 24%
Student > Master 20 18%
Professor 9 8%
Researcher 6 5%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 23%
Social Sciences 17 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,329,815
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#71
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,276
of 186,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.