↓ Skip to main content

Health and the green economy: challenges for sustainable development and the eradication of poverty

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health and the green economy: challenges for sustainable development and the eradication of poverty
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2012
DOI 10.1590/s1413-81232012000600010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edmundo Gallo, Andréia Faraoni Freitas Setti, Danielly de Paiva Magalhães, Jorge Mesquita Huet Machado, Daniel Forsin Buss, Francisco de Abreu Franco Netto, Paulo Marchiori Buss

Abstract

In a scenario where ecosystemic services are being eroded and there is high social inequity, a new model of development is necessary, namely one capable of promoting social development with a reduction of its ecological footprint. The 'Green Economy' model is one of the proposed models. This paper seeks to analyze the environmental, social and individual impacts on human health in the context of a 'brown economy', and discusses the contributions of a green economy on the promotion of equity and health. The assumption is that economic development and environmental sustainability are not incompatible and both contribute to the eradication of poverty. The transition to a sustainable economy depends on political decisions, and transcends technological developments. Above all, it should instigate new models of production, consumption and social organization, which promote socio-environmental justice, encouraging social participation and democratic forms of governance to define a solid agenda for the implementation of sustainable development and mechanisms to implement them at all levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,510
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,676
of 181,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.