↓ Skip to main content

Myths and facts in teaching of projective techniques

Overview of attention for article published in PsicoUSF, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Myths and facts in teaching of projective techniques
Published in
PsicoUSF, May 2014
DOI 10.1590/s1413-82712014000100010
Authors

Fabiano Koich Miguel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 5%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 31%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 62%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2017.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PsicoUSF
#22
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,791
of 241,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PsicoUSF
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them