↓ Skip to main content

Las pulsaciones canibalísticas de la oralidad

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 156)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Las pulsaciones canibalísticas de la oralidad
Published in
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental, February 2014
DOI 10.1590/s1415-47142013000400004
Authors

Francisco Pizarro Obaid

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental
#18
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,855
of 322,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them