↓ Skip to main content

Mucopolysaccharidosis I, II, and VI: brief review and guidelines for treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics and Molecular Biology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 771)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mucopolysaccharidosis I, II, and VI: brief review and guidelines for treatment
Published in
Genetics and Molecular Biology, November 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1415-47572010005000093
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Giugliani, Andressa Federhen, Maria Verônica Muñoz Rojas, Taiane Vieira, Osvaldo Artigalás, Louise Lapagesse Pinto, Ana Cecília Azevedo, Angelina Acosta, Carmen Bonfim, Charles Marques Lourenço, Chong Ae Kim, Dafne Horovitz, Denize Bonfim, Denise Norato, Diane Marinho, Durval Palhares, Emerson Santana Santos, Erlane Ribeiro, Eugênia Valadares, Fábio Guarany, Gisele Rosone de Lucca, Helena Pimentel, Isabel Neves de Souza, Jordão Correa, José Carlos Fraga, José Eduardo Goes, José Maria Cabral, José Simionato, Juan Llerena, Laura Jardim, Liane Giuliani, Luiz Carlos Santana da Silva, Mara L. Santos, Maria Angela Moreira, Marcelo Kerstenetzky, Márcia Ribeiro, Nicole Ruas, Patricia Barrios, Paulo Aranda, Rachel Honjo, Raquel Boy, Ronaldo Costa, Carolina Souza, Flavio F. Alcantara, Silvio Gilberto A. Avilla, Simone Fagondes, Ana Maria Martins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 220 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Master 22 10%
Other 19 8%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 56 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 67 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#48
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,656
of 110,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.