↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of the genetic risks of a metallic alloy used in medical implants

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics and Molecular Biology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of the genetic risks of a metallic alloy used in medical implants
Published in
Genetics and Molecular Biology, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1415-47572010005000118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristiano C. Gomes, Leonardo M. Moreira, Vanessa J.S.V. Santos, Alfeu S. Ramos, Juliana P. Lyon, Cristina P. Soares, Fabio V. Santos

Abstract

The use of artificial implants provides a palliative or permanent solution for individuals who have lost some bodily function through disease, an accident or natural wear. This functional loss can be compensated for by the use of medical devices produced from special biomaterials. Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) is a well-established primary metallic biomaterial for orthopedic implants, but the toxicity of the chemical components of this alloy has become an issue of concern. In this work, we used the MTT assay and micronucleus assay to examine the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity, respectively, of an extract obtained from this alloy. The MTT assay indicated that the mitochondrial activity and cell viability of CHO-K1 cells were unaffected by exposure to the extract. However, the micronucleus assay revealed DNA damage and an increase in micronucleus frequency at all of the concentrations tested. These results show that ions released from Ti-6Al-4V alloy can cause DNA and nuclear damage and reinforce the importance of assessing the safety of metallic medical devices constructed from biomaterials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Master 21 14%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 35 23%
Materials Science 22 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 9%
Chemistry 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 47 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#310
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,331
of 190,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.