↓ Skip to main content

The golden age of Drosophila research at the Universidade de São Paulo (USP): a testimonial on the decades 1940-1950

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics and Molecular Biology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The golden age of Drosophila research at the Universidade de São Paulo (USP): a testimonial on the decades 1940-1950
Published in
Genetics and Molecular Biology, February 2013
DOI 10.1590/s1415-47572014000100020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luiz Edmundo de Magalhães, Carlos Ribeiro Vilela

Abstract

This article is a testimonial written by the first author regarding the research work performed with Drosophila between 1943 and 1959, at the Departamento de Biologia Geral of the Universidade de São Paulo (USP), which permitted the building of a nucleus of excellence. This research work, focused on the systematics and population genetics of the Neotropical species, began during the first of Dobzhansky's six visits to USP. Special attention was given to the multinational megaprojects conducted during his longer stays, from August 1948 to July 1949 and from June 1955 to July 1956. The role played by the Rockefeller Foundation is duly remembered, and so is the undeniable contribution brought by Dobzhansky, to the establishment of several laboratories dedicated to research in the field of natural population genetics and to the qualification of human resources. On the other hand, important "backstage" episodes are retrieved which were omitted in the official history and occurred from the planning to the execution of the project, carried out on the Angra dos Reis islands. Special attention was given to the relationship problems which resulted from Dobzhansky's, the leader's, difficult personality and contributed to the failure of the second and last multinational project.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 40%
Arts and Humanities 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#408
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,295
of 205,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics and Molecular Biology
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.