↓ Skip to main content

Avaliação de um esquema de realimentação utilizado após 43 dias de jejum voluntário

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Nutrição, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avaliação de um esquema de realimentação utilizado após 43 dias de jejum voluntário
Published in
Revista de Nutrição, January 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1415-52732008000500003
Authors

Nídia Denise Pucci, Belchor Fontes, Renato Sérgio Poggetti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Nutrição
#64
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,094
of 184,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Nutrição
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them