↓ Skip to main content

Teste in vitro de citotoxicidade: estudo comparativo entre duas metodologias

Overview of attention for article published in Materials Research, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Teste in vitro de citotoxicidade: estudo comparativo entre duas metodologias
Published in
Materials Research, November 2003
DOI 10.1590/s1516-14392003000300003
Authors

Sizue Ota Rogero, Ademar Benévolo Lugão, Tamiko Ichikawa Ikeda, Áurea Silveira Cruz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
Unknown 348 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 77 22%
Student > Master 74 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 79 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 17%
Chemistry 31 9%
Engineering 31 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 7%
Other 70 20%
Unknown 108 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,915,476
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Materials Research
#242
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,103
of 142,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.