↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of rare earth oxides doping SnO2.(Co1/4,Mn3/4)O-based varistor system

Overview of attention for article published in Materials Research, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of rare earth oxides doping SnO2.(Co1/4,Mn3/4)O-based varistor system
Published in
Materials Research, October 2006
DOI 10.1590/s1516-14392006000300015
Authors

Alessandro Dibb, Mario Cilense, Paulo Roberto Bueno, Yves Maniette, José Arana Varela, Elson Longo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 75%
Librarian 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 25%
Materials Science 1 25%
Chemistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Materials Research
#70
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,589
of 84,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them