You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deficiência auditiva infantil: implicações e soluções
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista CEFAC, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1516-18462007000100014 |
| Authors |
Cladi Inês Gatto, Tania Maria Tochetto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 49% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 17% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista CEFAC
#15
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,971
of 82,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista CEFAC
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them