↓ Skip to main content

Soluble transferrin receptor and immature reticulocytes are not useful for distinguishing iron-deficiency anemia from heterozygous beta-thalassemia

Overview of attention for article published in Sao Paulo Medical Journal, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Soluble transferrin receptor and immature reticulocytes are not useful for distinguishing iron-deficiency anemia from heterozygous beta-thalassemia
Published in
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, July 2003
DOI 10.1590/s1516-31802003000200012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gisélia Aparecida Freire Maia de Lima, Helena Zerlotti Wolf Grotto

Abstract

Iron deficiency and heterozygous beta-thalassemia are important causes of hypochromic-microcytic anemia. Two laboratory parameters are suggested for the differentiation of such anemia. High-fluorescence reticulocyte counts and soluble transferrin receptor levels were determined in iron-deficiency anemia patients (n = 49) and heterozygous beta-thalassemia patients (n = 43). There was no significant difference in high-fluorescence reticulocyte and soluble transferrin receptor values between the two groups, but a correlation was observed between high-fluorescence reticulocytes and soluble transferrin receptors in iron-deficiency anemia, probably due to increased receptor synthesis as a response to decreased iron content in erythrocytes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 43%
Lecturer 1 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%