↓ Skip to main content

Is neuromuscular electrical stimulation effective for improving pain, function and activities of daily living of knee osteoarthritis patients? A randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Sao Paulo Medical Journal, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is neuromuscular electrical stimulation effective for improving pain, function and activities of daily living of knee osteoarthritis patients? A randomized clinical trial
Published in
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, April 2013
DOI 10.1590/s1516-31802013000100017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Mizusaki Imoto, Maria Stella Peccin, Lucas Emmanuel Pedro de Paiva Teixeira, Kelson Nonato Gomes da Silva, Marcelo Abrahão, Virgínia Fernandes Moça Trevisani

Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been used in rehabilitation protocols for patients suffering from muscle weakness resulting from knee osteoarthritis. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of an eight-week treatment program of NMES combined with exercises, for improving pain and function among patients with knee osteoarthritis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 128 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Master 19 15%
Other 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 41 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 46 36%