↓ Skip to main content

Methods for predicting the energy value of pet foods

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 351)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods for predicting the energy value of pet foods
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, October 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1516-35982009001300001
Authors

Carlos Castrillo, Marta Hervera, Maria Dolores Baucells

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#47
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,599
of 108,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.