You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Silage microbiology and its control through additives
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1516-35982010001300021 |
Authors |
Richard E. Muck |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 3% |
Student > Master | 2 | 2% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 1% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 1% |
Professor | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 83 | 89% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 85 | 91% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#47
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,251
of 104,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.