You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Desempenho e características de carcaça de bovinos de corte de quatro grupos genéticos terminados em confinamento
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1516-35982011000700023 |
Authors |
Saulo Malaguido Clímaco, Edson Luis de Azambuja Ribeiro, Ivone Yurika Mizubuti, Leandro das Dores Ferreira da Silva, Marco Aurélio Alves de Freitas Barbosa, Ana Maria Bridi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 67% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 67% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#335
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,538
of 136,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.