↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines of the Brazilian Medical Association for the treatment of depression (complete version)

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines of the Brazilian Medical Association for the treatment of depression (complete version)
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, July 2003
DOI 10.1590/s1516-44462003000200013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck, Beny Lafer, Everton Botelho Sougey, José Alberto Del Porto, Marco Antônio Brasil, Mário Francisco Juruena

Abstract

Depression is a frequent and chronic condition with high levels of functional disability. Brazilian Medical Association Guidelines project proposed guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of the most common medical disorders. The objective of this paper is to present the original document that originated the abbreviated version available at the electronic address of Brazilian Medical Association. This paper was based on guidelines developed in other countries and systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials and when absent, observational studies and recommendations from experts. Brazilian Medical Association proposed this methodology for the whole project. The following aspects are presented: prevalence, demographics, disability, diagnostics and sub-diagnosis, efficacy of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatment, costs and side-effects of different classes of available drugs in Brazil. Planning of different phases of treatment is22 also discussed. Guidelines are a good tool helping clinical decisions and are a reference for an attitude based on levels of evidence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 33%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#292
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,524
of 52,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.