↓ Skip to main content

Fundamentos, modelos conceituais, aplicações e pesquisa da terapia cognitiva

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fundamentos, modelos conceituais, aplicações e pesquisa da terapia cognitiva
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, November 2008
DOI 10.1590/s1516-44462008000600002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo Knapp, Aaron T Beck

Abstract

There is growing interest in the cognitive model of psychotherapy stimulated by an extensive body of research findings demonstrating its effectiveness for a varied set of psychiatric disorders and medical conditions. This review article aims to give an overview of the historical and philosophical background to contemporary cognitive and cognitive-behavioral approaches to psychotherapy, pointing out similarities across and differences between them. A presentation of the cognitive model as designed by Aaron Beck, and some of the cognitive and behavioral techniques used in emotional disorders will be discussed. Outcome studies and meta-analyses contemplating the efficacy of cognitive and cognitive-behavioral therapies in various psychological and medical conditions will be briefly depicted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 362 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 117 32%
Student > Master 72 20%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 4%
Professor 14 4%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 98 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 175 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 5%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Social Sciences 5 1%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 100 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,880,407
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#55
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,564
of 180,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.