↓ Skip to main content

Diretrizes da Associação Médica Brasileira para o tratamento do transtorno de ansiedade social

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diretrizes da Associação Médica Brasileira para o tratamento do transtorno de ansiedade social
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2012
DOI 10.1590/s1516-44462011000300014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle N. Levitan, Marcos H. N. Chagas, José A. S. Crippa, Gisele G. Manfro, Luiz A. B. Hetem, Nathalia C. Andrada, Giovanni A. Salum, Luciano Isolan, Maria C. F. Ferrari, Antonio E. Nardi

Abstract

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is the most common anxiety disorder, usually with no remission, and is commonly associated with significant functional and psychosocial impairment. The Brazilian Medical Association (BMA), with the project named Diretrizes (Guidelines, in English), seeks to develop consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of common diseases. The aim of this article is to present the most important findings of the guidelines on the treatment of SAD, serving as a reference for the general practitioner and specialist.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 5%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 36%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 17 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2011.
All research outputs
#22,834,739
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#791
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,967
of 250,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.