↓ Skip to main content

History of Science: purposes, methods and problems

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Educação (Bauru), May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
History of Science: purposes, methods and problems
Published in
Ciência & Educação (Bauru), May 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1516-73132005000200011
Authors

Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira Martins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 4%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 21%
Student > Bachelor 20 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Professor 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 23%
Chemistry 13 13%
Arts and Humanities 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Physics and Astronomy 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2022.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Educação (Bauru)
#68
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,428
of 120,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Educação (Bauru)
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.