You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Root anatomy of nine orchidaceae species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1516-89131999000400005 |
| Authors |
Virginia del Carmem Oliveira, Maria das Graças Sajo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
#59
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,273
of 120,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.