You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estudo comparativo de duas técnicas farmacopéicas de avaliação da atividade antimicrobiana dos fármacos: nistatina, eritromicina, neomicina e gentamicina
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Ciências Farmacêuticas, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1516-93322004000200011 |
| Authors |
Tatiane Margato Vital, Cleomenes Reis, Marco Túlio Antonio García-Zapata, Luiz Carlos da Cunha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ciências Farmacêuticas
#39
of 51 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,745
of 62,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ciências Farmacêuticas
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.