↓ Skip to main content

Osteossarcoma e condrossarcoma: diferenciação radiográfica por meio da tomografia computadorizada

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Osteossarcoma e condrossarcoma: diferenciação radiográfica por meio da tomografia computadorizada
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, June 2002
DOI 10.1590/s1517-74912002000100012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia dos Santos Tossato, Amanda Cáceres Pereira, Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 33%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#296
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,902
of 48,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.