↓ Skip to main content

In vitro evaluation of different chemical agents for the decontamination of gutta-percha cones

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vitro evaluation of different chemical agents for the decontamination of gutta-percha cones
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, August 2003
DOI 10.1590/s1517-74912003000100014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rogério Emílio de Souza, Eduardo Antônio de Souza, Manoel Damião Sousa-Neto, Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues Pietro

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of three disinfectants used in Dentistry for decontamination of gutta-percha cones. Sixty gutta-percha cones were contaminated with standardized pure cultures of five species of microorganisms (Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Candida albicans ATCC CBS-ICB/USP 562, Bacillus subtilis spores ATCC 6633 and Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175). The cones were treated with 10% polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine aqueous solution (PVP-I; Groups 1 and 2), 5.25% aqueous sodium hypochlorite (Groups 3 and 4) and paraformaldehyde tablets (Group 5). All chemical agents were efficient for the cold sterilization of gutta-percha cones in short time periods.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Unspecified 1 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Materials Science 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#194
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,889
of 53,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.