↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of the hrpZ gene from Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicolaM2

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of the hrpZ gene from Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicolaM2
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, September 2015
DOI 10.1590/s1517-838246320140655
Pubmed ID
Authors

César Álvarez-Mejía, Dalia Rodríguez-Ríos, Gustavo Hernández-Guzmán, Varinia López-Ramírez, Humberto Valenzuela-Soto, Rodolfo Marsch

Abstract

Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola is a natural pathogen of members of the Brassicaceae plant family. Using a transposon-based mutagenesis strategy in Pseudomonas syringaepv. maculicola M2 (PsmM2), we conducted a genetic screen to identify mutants that were capable of growing in M9 medium supplemented with a crude extract from the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. A mutant containing a transposon insertion in the hrpZ gene (PsmMut8) was unable to infect adult plants from Arabidopsis thaliana or Brassica oleracea, suggesting a loss of pathogenicity. The promotorless cat reporter present in the gene trap was expressed if PsmMut8 was grown in minimal medium (M9) supplemented with the leaf extract but not if grown in normal rich medium (KB). We conducted phylogenetic analysis using hrpAZB genes, showing the classical 5-clade distribution, and nucleotide diversity analysis, showing the putative position for selective pressure in this operon. Our results indicate that the hrpAZB operon from Pseudomonas syringaepv. maculicola M2 is necessary for its pathogenicity and that its diversity would be under host-mediated diversifying selection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 64%
Unspecified 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,473,509
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#205
of 1,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,058
of 276,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.