↓ Skip to main content

A review of prey choice in bembicine sand wasps (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Neotropical Entomology, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of prey choice in bembicine sand wasps (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae)
Published in
Neotropical Entomology, March 2002
DOI 10.1590/s1519-566x2002000100001
Authors

HOWARD E. EVANS

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 7%
Bangladesh 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Cuba 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Benin 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 48 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 83%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neotropical Entomology
#135
of 774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,285
of 49,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neotropical Entomology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.