You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Loss of tissue samples in the tissue microarray: comparison between techniques using commercial adhesive tape, silane-coated microslides by the conventional method and by a modified technique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1676-24442008000500008 |
| Authors |
Joaquim Soares de Almeida, Henrique de Oliveira Costa, Flavio de Oliveira Lima, Nathanael Pinheiro, Celina Tizuko Fujiyama Oshima, Thiago Simão Gomes, Marcello Franco |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial
#10
of 88 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,704
of 101,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them