You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implante de filtro de veia cava com uso de dióxido de carbono como meio de contraste: série de casos
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1677-54492012000100004 |
| Authors |
Matheus Pessanha de Rezende, Bernardo Massière, Arno von Ristow, Alberto Vescovi, Alexandre A. Duarte, Daniel A. Drummond, Leonardo Stambovsky, Antonio Luiz de Medina |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 50% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 75% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
#25
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,629
of 202,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them