You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structural analysis of testicular appendices in patients with cryptorchidism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2013.02.13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guilherme D. Tostes, Suelen F. Costa, João P. de Carvalho, Waldemar S. Costa, Francisco J.b. Sampaio, Luciano A. Favorito |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 75% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#171
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,448
of 212,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.