↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasound guided endoscopic combined Intrarenal surgery – 10 steps for the success

Overview of attention for article published in International Brazilian Journal of Urology, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 726)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrasound guided endoscopic combined Intrarenal surgery – 10 steps for the success
Published in
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, October 2022
DOI 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2022.0029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio C. Vicentini, Kayann Kaled Reda El Hayek, Marcelo Szwarc, Rodrigo Perrella, Priscila Kuriki, David Cohen, Daniel Beltrame, Carlos Alfredo Batagello, Claudio Murta, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro

Abstract

Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) has been used to treat complex kidney stones (1). The combined use of ultrasound (US) has the potential to improve safety and reduce radiation exposure, however, it is still underutilized (2). Our objective is to describe, in a step-by-step manner, the ultrasound-guided ECIRS (USG ECIRS) technique, in order to facilitate learning by urologists. We describe the 10 standardized steps that we recommend to achieve a good outcome, based on our previous experience on a high-volume kidney stone center. We recorded a case of a 37-year-old female patient with complex bilateral kidney stones that underwent a left simultaneous combined retrograde and antegrade approach. The 10 described steps are: 1 - case evaluation with CT scan (3); 2 - preoperative care with antibiotics and tranexamic acid; 3 - warm-up and training with phantoms; 4 - patient positioning in Barts flank free position; 5 - retrograde nephroscopy with flexible ureteroscope; 6 - US and endoscopic guided puncture; 7 - tract dilation under endoscopic view; 8 - stone fragmentation; 9 - status free checking and 10, kidney drainage. Images were captured by external and internal cameras, promoting a complete understanding of the procedure. The patient has signed a written informed consent form. Puncture was achieved under US guidance with one attempt. Another puncture was necessary in the lower pole, parallel to the initial puncture, due to a large fragment. Surgical time was 140 min. Stone-free status was verified by retrograde and antegrade view. Kidney drainage was done with ureteral stent on string, removed after 7 days. Hb drop was 1.1 Hb/dL. The first postoperative day CT scan showed no residual stones and no complications. The patient was discharged after the CT and urethral catheter removal. The USG ECIRS seems to be a very efficient and reproducible technique for the treatment of complex kidney stones. Its use should be widespread.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 8 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,281,491
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#31
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,185
of 439,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.