You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of gender and bruxism on the human maximum bite force
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1678-77572006000600011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrícia dos Santos Calderon, Evelyn Mikaela Kogawa, José Roberto Pereira Lauris, Paulo César Rodrigues Conti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 52% |
| Engineering | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,324,527
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#10
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,588
of 169,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.