You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critical analysis of artificial teeth for endodontic teaching
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1678-77572008000100009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Renata Giazzi Nassri, Jaime Carlik, Camila Roberta Nepomuceno da Silva, Renata Elisa Okagawa, Suzy Lin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 28% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 69% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#48
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,207
of 172,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them