↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of canal walls after biomechanical preparation of root canals instrumented with protaper universalTM rotary system

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of canal walls after biomechanical preparation of root canals instrumented with protaper universalTM rotary system
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1678-77572009000600010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Menezes Aguiar, Daniela de Andrade Mendes, Andréa Cruz Câmara, Jose Antonio Poli de Figueiredo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 64%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2016.
All research outputs
#17,351,840
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#216
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,624
of 173,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.