You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adequacy of human milk viscosity to respond to infants with dysphagia: experimental study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1678-77572011000600003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariangela de Mattos de Bartha ALMEIDA, João Aprígio Guerra de ALMEIDA, Maria Elisabeth Lopes MOREIRA, Franz Reis NOVAK |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,373,631
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#62
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,146
of 168,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.