You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1678-77572011000600021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrícia Costa CRUZ, Ingrid Machado de ANDRADE, Amanda PERACINI, Maria Cristina Monteiro de SOUZA-GUGELMIN, Cláudia Helena SILVA-LOVATO, Raphael Freitas de SOUZA, Helena de Freitas Oliveira PARANHOS |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 52% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2012.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#156
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,736
of 168,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.