↓ Skip to main content

Influence of root canal sealer on the radiographic appearance of filling voids in maxillary single-rooted teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of root canal sealer on the radiographic appearance of filling voids in maxillary single-rooted teeth
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, September 2012
DOI 10.1590/s1678-77572012000400003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Augusto BODANEZI, Etiene Andrade MUNHOZ, Ana Lúcia Álvares CAPELOZZA, Norberti BERNARDINELI, Ivaldo Gomes de MORAES, Roberto Brandão GARCIA, Clovis Monteiro BRAMANTE

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#304
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,929
of 190,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.