You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1678-77572012000400008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rafael Francisco Lia MONDELLI, Juliana Felipi David e Góes de AZEVEDO, Ana Carolina FRANCISCONI, Cristiane Machado de ALMEIDA, Sérgio Kiyoshi ISHIKIRIAMA |
| Abstract |
This study evaluated color change, stability, and tooth sensitivity in patients submitted to different bleaching techniques. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 6% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 52 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 59 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2012.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#203
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,008
of 190,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.