You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Jardim de chuva: sistema de biorretenção para o manejo das águas pluviais urbanas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambiente Construído, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1678-86212014000400011 |
| Authors |
Tássia dos Anjos Tenório de Melo, Artur Paiva Coutinho, Jaime Joaquim da Silva Pereira Cabral, Antônio Celso Dantas Antonino, José Almir Cirilo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 39 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 42 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ambiente Construído
#6
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,577
of 360,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambiente Construído
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them