↓ Skip to main content

Scholarly communication in the web 2.0 environment: why not?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scholarly communication in the web 2.0 environment: why not?
Published in
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, January 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1678-91992009000100001
Authors

Suely de Brito Clemente Soares

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 15%
Canada 2 15%
Brazil 1 8%
Portugal 1 8%
United Kingdom 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 31%
Librarian 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 23%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 31%
Computer Science 4 31%
Arts and Humanities 2 15%
Psychology 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
#332
of 539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,096
of 183,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.