↓ Skip to main content

"Rio +20: what we can learn from the process and what is missing"

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos EBAPE.BR, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 135)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
"Rio +20: what we can learn from the process and what is missing"
Published in
Cadernos EBAPE.BR, October 2012
DOI 10.1590/s1679-39512012000300003
Authors

Jose A. Puppim de Oliveira

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 40%
Other 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 5 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos EBAPE.BR
#49
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,201
of 202,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos EBAPE.BR
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them