You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrative review: what is it? How to do it?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Einstein (São Paulo), March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1679-45082010rw1134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcela Tavares de Souza, Michelly Dias da Silva, Rachel de Carvalho |
| Abstract |
The integrative review is the methodology that provides synthesis of knowledge and applicability of results of significant studies to practice. To present the phases of an integrative review and the relevant aspects to be taken into account when using this methodological resource. This study was based on bibliographic search and on the experience of the authors when performing an integrative review. Presentation of the six stages of the integrative review process: preparing the guiding question, searching or sampling the literature, data collection, critical analysis of the studies included, discussion of results and presentation of the integrative review. Considering the need to assure care based on scientific evidence, the integrative review has been identified as a unique tool in healthcare for it synthesizes investigations available on the given topic and guides practice based on scientific knowledge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,710 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1701 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 297 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 270 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 120 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 85 | 5% |
| Other | 262 | 15% |
| Unknown | 577 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 388 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 210 | 12% |
| Psychology | 77 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 70 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 50 | 3% |
| Other | 290 | 17% |
| Unknown | 625 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,536,679
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#158
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,361
of 102,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.