You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Distintas manifestações do tumor odontogênico cístico calcificante
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Einstein (São Paulo), October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1679-45082012000300019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Estevam Rubens Utumi, Irineu Gregnanin Pedron, Leopoldo Penteado Nucci da Silva, Gustavo Grothe Machado, André Caroli Rocha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 91% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 95% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#107
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,549
of 202,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.