↓ Skip to main content

Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Einstein (São Paulo), January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation
Published in
Einstein (São Paulo), January 2015
DOI 10.1590/s1679-45082015rw3155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sérgio Paiva Meira, Bianca Della Guardia, Andréia Silva Evangelista, Celso Eduardo Lourenço Matielo, Douglas Bastos Neves, Fernando Luis Pandullo, Guilherme Eduardo Gonçalves Felga, Jefferson André da Silva Alves, Lilian Amorim Curvelo, Luiz Gustavo Guedes Diaz, Marcela Balbo Rusi, Marcelo de Melo Viveiros, Marcio Dias de Almeida, Marina Gabrielle Epstein, Pamella Tung Pedroso, Paolo Salvalaggio, Roberto Ferreira Meirelles, Rodrigo Andrey Rocco, Samira Scalso de Almeida, Marcelo Bruno de Rezende

Abstract

Intestinal transplantation has shown exceptional growth over the past 10 years. At the end of the 1990's, intestinal transplantation moved out of the experimental realm to become a routine practice in treating patients with severe complications related to total parenteral nutrition and intestinal failure. In the last years, several centers reported an increasing improvement in survival outcomes (about 80%), during the first 12 months after surgery, but long-term survival is still a challenge. Several advances led to clinical application of transplants. Immunosuppression involved in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation was the biggest gain for this procedure in the past decade due to tacrolimus, and new inducing drugs, mono- and polyclonal anti-lymphocyte antibodies. Despite the advancement of rigid immunosuppression protocols, rejection is still very frequent in the first 12 months, and can result in long-term graft loss. The future of intestinal transplantation and multivisceral transplantation appears promising. The major challenge is early recognition of acute rejection in order to prevent graft loss, opportunistic infections associated to complications, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease and graft versus host disease; and consequently, improve results in the long run.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Other 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#421
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,628
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.